one month on in Mindanao

As you make your way past Tagum City—a town about an hour north of Davao City in Mindanao, and the place where Save the Children has decided to base its Bopha/Pablo typhoon response operations—the destruction slowly increases with each kilometre you travel.  Up through the Compostela Valley there are pockets of destruction—in some areas almost no structure has a roof and many wood and bamboo structures have been completely destroyed; other areas are relatively untouched.  

This paled in comparison to the almost total devastation of the coastal areas of Boston, Cateel and Baganga in Davao Oriental Province.  The once lush, green forested areas that back the beautiful coastline are now almost completely barren—coconut trees lie as they fell like giant sticks littering the sides of the hills.

In Baganga Municipality, where Typhoon Bopha/Pablo made landfall, the destruction is all encompassing and extensive.  Local authorities there have registered 156 deaths from the Typhoon with 85 people still missing.  Authorities were quick to point out, however, that this figure could potentially go up as it has been hard to access many of the far flung barangays or villages.  Like in other Municipalities, local child protection councils had been formed before the typhoon, but most are not very functional and given the scale of the destruction and the focus on meeting the basic survival needs of people, child protection has not been a key focus of relief operations.  I had made the appeal two days earlier at an OCHA led workshop on Humanitarian Action Plan (HAP) revisions that it was time that we considered child protection as a lifesaving sector. This is one of Save the Children’s key advocacy messages and in line with the newly launched Child Protection in Emergency Minimum Standards.

Image

In Baganga, I was told by a Municipality worker that roughly 25% of children were out of school before the typhoon.  “These children were primarily engaged in coconut harvesting and fishing work,” she said.  “Now that the coconut trees have been destroyed, we worry that even more teenagers will not return to school and will migrate to other areas to look for work and other opportunities. They will be extremely vulnerable.”

10 bunkhouses—ten families can be housed in one bunkhouse—are planned and/or are already partially completed for the Municipality, yet we heard concerns from locals that these shelters offered little in the way of privacy for women and children.  “There were some cases of sexual and gender based violence against women before the Typhoon,” a Municipality authority stated, “so we are concerned about the safety of women and girls.  Shelter is a pressing need, but more inputs are needed from women, girls and children before construction of these bunkhouses.”

Children in all three Municipalities that I spoke with, while in many ways displaying a great sense of resiliency, appeared in many ways to be having difficulty processing the aftermath of the emergency.  Universally, all children I spoke with said that when it stormed, or was windy or rained that it made them feel scared.  Adults and parents corroborated this.  Adults also commented that while children continue to find some time playing with friends, they rarely talked and that their play was somehow lethargic and emotionless.  Many children I spoke with were scared that they might not be able to return to school (despite plans for schools to reopen soon) or that they might not be able to ever meet friends that had left the area. Others feared that their families’ loss of livelihoods options might mean they would have to drop out of school and migrate with their family in search of work and income.

Image

In Baganga, Municipality authorities commented that while parents in the area were generally well meaning they lacked extensive knowledge of positive caregiving for their children—this worried her in that as the recovery period wore on, adults may become more stressed and frustrated themselves and might “take out” these frustrations on their children.  “Parents here need information on how to care for their children better both after an emergency and in normal circumstances,” she said.

In order to address this, Save the Children has established and/or is in the process of establishing Child Friendly Spaces (CFS) as a safe space for children to come together and take part in structured activities which helps them gain a greater sense of normalcy and builds on innate resiliency.  Moreover, the CFS gives parents/adults time to begin to rebuild their own lives while not having to worry about the safety and care of their children.  The CFS is an environment in which parents can also receive positive caregiving and parenting inputs from Save the Children and partner organisations trained in positive discipline and caregiving.  10 CFS’ are planned for Compostela Valley and 5 for Cateel with plans afoot to raise additional funding for psychosocial and other child protection programming in additional communities in Davao Oriental.  In each community, Save the Children will help to organise and establish a Child Protection Committee or Group, which can help with monitoring protection issues and can link their efforts with Municipality and other authorities.

 

Children caught up in crisis events need information. They need to know what has happened and why, in order to rebuild understandings about the world and themselves. Save the Children encourages caregivers to talk to children about what has happened and stands committed to work with parents, partners, duty bearers and children themselves on ensuring the protection of all children—it is a lifesaving matter. 

a tenacity that pays off

On a rainy afternoon in August, I had an opportunity to meet with and learn from a Save the Children supported Child Protection Group (CPG) in a ward of Hlaingthayar Township—a peri-urban area of Yangon which attracts many migrants from across the country who come to work in one of the many factories or take up construction work or other daily wage earning jobs.  Hlaingthayar has one of the highest rates of underage recruitment into the military in the country and is rife with working children.

Established in 2009, the CPG is an excellent and poignant example of our community-based approach to promoting child protection.  The group frequently meets with Township authorities, including Myanmar Child Law sanctioned Township Child Rights Committees, to strategise on both preventive and response measures in addressing protection issues.  Led by a dynamic woman, the CPG has recently been able to resolve 30 child protection cases—15 of which involved the underage recruitment of children into the military.

Three boys who had been recruited—still under the age of 18—joined us on this afternoon to tell us their stories.  None had willingly joined.  All three had very similarly been duped into meeting a “broker” at a location to discuss the potential of some part-time work opportunities.  They were then taken to a couple of locations and eventually found themselves at a military recruitment centre.  The chances of gaining the quick release of children from the military are much greater in the first few days as recruits will then be sent to various training camps around the country. From there, they will be sent to other locations sometimes even to the “frontlines” of fighting.  One of the children we spoke with had been sent to the frontline in one of Myanmar’s restive ethnic regions and had witnessed and took part in fighting.

It was really due to the tenacity of the CPG in coordination with the children’s parents, Save the Children and ILO that these children were successfully released.  The CPG acted quickly in all three cases discussing the issue with parents, local authorities, including school authorities, and referring the cases to the ILO through their complaints mechanism.  Together with parents, they travelled to recruitment centres and tried to discuss the children in question with recruitment centre officials and administrators.  In one particular case, it was only after several visits with school authorities that the CPG was able to obtain a letter verifying that the boy had been attending school (in the absence of age verification/birth registration documentation, having a letter from a school authority is vital) per the requests of recruitment centre officials.

While the CPG’s tenacity is laudable, they offered suggestions for streamlining the process for release from recruitment centres.  CPGs across the country who have intervened in cases of underage recruitment tell similar stories—that they are often asked to produce a litany of documentation and letters, which more often than not can delay the process.  On a policy level, Save the Children is a key member of Myanmar’s Country Task Force on Monitoring and Reporting (CTFMR) and in addition to contributing to the bi-monthly and yearly reports on CAAC in the country, the CTFMR is currently working on a Joint Plan of Action with the Government, which includes more systematic regulations and requirements, including documentation, for both access to recruitment centres and gaining the release of children who have been recruited.

While some underage recruitment of children continues, the efforts and presence of the CPG has had a significant impact on reducing it. As the chair of the CPG told us, “Brokers don’t dare operate within the Ward anymore since they know that we monitor these things.  Recruitment can only take place on the fringes of the community, so we are working hard on community awareness raising and ensuring that both children and parents are aware of the risks and ways to keep themselves safe.”

doing advocacy; doing vipassana…

Finding new ways to put my vipassana “training” to good use here (and from the land where vipassana was re-invigorated!).  Take a deep breath; now advocate (from your head to your toes…:)

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><

They say that it’s difficult to do advocacy work in Myanmar.  While we may have to take a slightly different and more methodical approach, some of our recent, more modest accomplishments bode well for the year and for mainstreaming “voices from the field” into our advocacy work.

When asked to contribute our suggestions/recommendations for the government’s 2011 Anti-Trafficking Action Plan, we thought it was the perfect opportunity to not only use our knowledge of what is happening on the ground, but to bring in the huge amount of information and recommendations that we had garnered over the past year directly from children and youth, such as those from the Mekong Youth Forum that I blogged on earlier.

Here are a few of the highlights from the 2011 plan emanating from Save the Children recommendations:

§  More frequent and effective cooperation between Myanmar-Thai and Myanmar-China authorities and commitments to quicken the pace with which children are being repatriated and reintegrated back to their home communities.

§  Awareness raising will be extended to cover a number of new regions this year in recognition of the high numbers of children trafficked from those areas;

§  Acknowledging Save the Children’s excellent work in mobilizing community-based child protection groups, more focus on community monitoring was highlighted in the 2011 plan as well as commitments to form additional Anti-Trafficking Task Forces in regions currently without

§  New rehabilitation shelters will be constructed as well as the development of standard operating procedures for working with survivors of trafficking; and for working with child survivors of trafficking, new trainings for authorities.

§  Corruption along border regions in particular has frequently been highlighted by children.  In this year’s action plan, there is a renewed commitment to work on punishing perpetrators of trafficking and rooting out corruption amongst officials.

The entire child protection team here realises that while these new action items are welcome and good news, policies and action plans in and of themselves will not be able to protect children—only the implementation of them will.  What we have accomplished in the short-term, however, is an acknowledgement of thanks from the government for not only pointing out the shortcomings in previous year’s action plans and implementation, but recommending workable solutions, offering our expertise to conduct trainings and to continue mobilizing communities around anti-trafficking initiatives.

It’s not the advocacy end game for us either, but it is a great start to the year!



IT and Development

Here’s a great post on ITs, social networking and development agendas:

So, next time someone proposes to throw the latest technological gizmo at a problem or is convinced that marvelous “apps” will definitely cure all kinds of ills in the world, I suggest that you ask: Will ITs help to connect people in ways that facilitate communication and collective action? What communication challenge will be addressed? How do we know if people communicate better, then, they will be in a better position to deal with a problem? What has happened in the past when then-new ITs were introduced? What communication and development challenges could ITs help us understand and hopefully address? These questions should be at the center of “net thinking” for social change and development.

http://www.comminit.com/en/node/328504/bbc